A side-by-side look at FXVM and Zomro — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
The only one with a confirmed Equinix LD4 (London) and NY4 (New York) presence - the real data centers forex brokers use - plus a page naming Bybit, Binance and Kraken directly for crypto optimization. Pricier than Zomro or FxSVPS for comparable specs, but the most verified infrastructure here.
Cheapest per-spec pricing here (Cloud Forex from EUR6.48/mo), but data centers are Poland/Netherlands/Germany/USA only - no London, New York or Tokyo confirmed, and static IP for crypto API whitelisting isn't documented. MT4/MT5 confirmed; a 'Big VDS' line couldn't be independently verified.
FXVM scores higher overall (4.7 vs 3.6), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
FXVM is the stronger fit for traders who want to confirm their specific broker is explicitly listed as supported before signing up., while Zomro is built more around traders who want a plan purpose-sized for either MetaTrader terminals or a crypto bot, not one generic tier for both..
Data centers: FXVM — 12 worldwide, incl. Tokyo, Singapore, New York, London. Zomro — Poland, Netherlands, Germany, USA.
Pick FXVM if you're mainly after traders who want to confirm their specific broker is explicitly listed as supported before signing up..
Pick Zomro if you're mainly after traders who want a plan purpose-sized for either MetaTrader terminals or a crypto bot, not one generic tier for both..
FXVM scores higher in our rating (4.7 vs 3.6), but Zomro may still be the better fit if you specifically need traders who want a plan purpose-sized for either MetaTrader terminals or a crypto bot, not one generic tier for both..
FXVM: 12 worldwide, incl. Tokyo, Singapore, New York, London. Zomro: Poland, Netherlands, Germany, USA.
