AMarkets
Best partner-program fitEntity differences and bonus conditions
A side-by-side look at AMarkets and XM — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Entity differences and bonus conditions
Need approved affiliate link; conditions vary by country
XM scores higher overall (4.6 vs 4.2), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
AMarkets is the stronger fit for copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research, while XM is built more around beginners, global traffic, broad account accessibility.
Regulation: AMarkets — Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. XM — Multiple global entities; verify local entity.
Minimum deposit: AMarkets — Check account type before funding. XM — Often low minimum deposit, depends on region.
Pick AMarkets if you're mainly after copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research. It stands out for copy trading materials and metaTrader support.
Pick XM if you're mainly after beginners, global traffic, broad account accessibility. It stands out for large global brand and very active partner program.
XM scores higher in our rating (4.6 vs 4.2), but AMarkets may still be the better fit if you specifically need copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research.
AMarkets: Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. XM: Multiple global entities; verify local entity.