FP Markets
Best raw-pricing candidatePartner link pending; good next review candidate
A side-by-side look at FP Markets and Pepperstone — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Partner link pending; good next review candidate
Need partner approval and tracking links before monetized CTA
Pepperstone scores higher overall (4.8 vs 4.7), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
FP Markets is the stronger fit for eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders, while Pepperstone is built more around active traders, cTrader users, TradingView workflows.
Regulation: FP Markets — ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, Seychelles and other group entities. Pepperstone — Licensed in multiple major jurisdictions.
Minimum deposit: FP Markets — Often from $100, depending on account/entity. Pepperstone — No fixed minimum in many regions.
Pick FP Markets if you're mainly after eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders. It stands out for strong partner program and raw pricing angle.
Pick Pepperstone if you're mainly after active traders, cTrader users, TradingView workflows. It stands out for strong regulation profile and excellent platform stack.
Pepperstone scores higher in our rating (4.8 vs 4.7), but FP Markets may still be the better fit if you specifically need eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders.
FP Markets: ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, Seychelles and other group entities. Pepperstone: Licensed in multiple major jurisdictions.