FXOpen
ECN legacy broker ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4.2
Needs fresh English review before stronger recommendation
FXOpen vs RoboForex
A side-by-side look at FXOpen and RoboForex — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Quick verdict
RoboForex scores higher overall (4.8 vs 4.2), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
FXOpen is the stronger fit for eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows, while RoboForex is built more around eA trading, copy trading, VPS setups.
Regulation: FXOpen — Check active entity for your country. RoboForex — Offshore entity; check country availability.
Minimum deposit: FXOpen — Depends on account type. RoboForex — From $10 on many accounts.
Side by side
FXOpenRoboForex
Best forECN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflowsEA trading, copy trading, VPS setups
PlatformsMT4, MT5, TickTraderMT4, MT5, R StocksTrader, Copy Trading
RegulationCheck active entity for your countryOffshore entity; check country availability
Minimum depositDepends on account typeFrom $10 on many accounts
FXOpen strengths
- Long-running brand
- ECN positioning
- Existing affiliate tracking
RoboForex strengths
- Strong platform choice
- Good automation fit
- Copy trading ecosystem
Which one should you pick?
Pick FXOpen if you're mainly after eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows. It stands out for long-running brand and eCN positioning.
Pick RoboForex if you're mainly after eA trading, copy trading, VPS setups. It stands out for strong platform choice and good automation fit.
Common questions
FXOpen vs RoboForex FAQ
Is FXOpen better than RoboForex?
RoboForex scores higher in our rating (4.8 vs 4.2), but FXOpen may still be the better fit if you specifically need eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows.
What's the difference in regulation between FXOpen and RoboForex?
FXOpen: Check active entity for your country. RoboForex: Offshore entity; check country availability.