Head-to-head comparison

Alpari vs FP Markets

A side-by-side look at Alpari and FP Markets — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.

Alpari

Legacy PAMM brand

★ ★ ★ ★★ ★ 4.0

We need a fresh English-focused review before a stronger recommendation

FP Markets

Best raw-pricing candidate

★ ★ ★ ★ ★★4.7

Partner link pending; good next review candidate

Quick verdict

FP Markets scores higher overall (4.7 vs 4.0), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.

Alpari is the stronger fit for pAMM research, historical managed-account comparison, while FP Markets is built more around eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders.

Regulation: Alpari — Entity and regional availability must be checked. FP Markets — ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, Seychelles and other group entities.

Minimum deposit: Alpari — Depends on account type. FP Markets — Often from $100, depending on account/entity.

Side by side

AlpariFP Markets

Best forPAMM research, historical managed-account comparisonECN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders

PlatformsMT4, MT5, PAMM-style investingMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, Iress in some regions

RegulationEntity and regional availability must be checkedASIC, CySEC, FSCA, Seychelles and other group entities

Minimum depositDepends on account typeOften from $100, depending on account/entity

Alpari strengths

Recognizable PAMM history
Managed-account angle
Useful comparison brand

FP Markets strengths

Strong partner program
Raw pricing angle
Broad CFD range

Which one should you pick?

Pick Alpari if you're mainly after pAMM research, historical managed-account comparison. It stands out for recognizable PAMM history and managed-account angle.

Pick FP Markets if you're mainly after eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders. It stands out for strong partner program and raw pricing angle.

Common questions