AMarkets
Best partner-program fitEntity differences and bonus conditions
A side-by-side look at AMarkets and FP Markets — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Entity differences and bonus conditions
Partner link pending; good next review candidate
FP Markets scores higher overall (4.7 vs 4.2), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
AMarkets is the stronger fit for copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research, while FP Markets is built more around eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders.
Regulation: AMarkets — Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. FP Markets — ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, Seychelles and other group entities.
Minimum deposit: AMarkets — Check account type before funding. FP Markets — Often from $100, depending on account/entity.
Pick AMarkets if you're mainly after copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research. It stands out for copy trading materials and metaTrader support.
Pick FP Markets if you're mainly after eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders. It stands out for strong partner program and raw pricing angle.
FP Markets scores higher in our rating (4.7 vs 4.2), but AMarkets may still be the better fit if you specifically need copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research.
AMarkets: Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. FP Markets: ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, Seychelles and other group entities.