AMarkets
Best partner-program fitEntity differences and bonus conditions
A side-by-side look at AMarkets and FXOpen — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Entity differences and bonus conditions
Needs fresh English review before stronger recommendation
FXOpen scores higher overall (4.2 vs 4.2), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
AMarkets is the stronger fit for copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research, while FXOpen is built more around eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows.
Regulation: AMarkets — Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. FXOpen — Check active entity for your country.
Minimum deposit: AMarkets — Check account type before funding. FXOpen — Depends on account type.
Pick AMarkets if you're mainly after copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research. It stands out for copy trading materials and metaTrader support.
Pick FXOpen if you're mainly after eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows. It stands out for long-running brand and eCN positioning.
FXOpen scores higher in our rating (4.2 vs 4.2), but AMarkets may still be the better fit if you specifically need copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research.
AMarkets: Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. FXOpen: Check active entity for your country.