AMarkets
Best partner-program fitEntity differences and bonus conditions
A side-by-side look at AMarkets and Interactive Brokers — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Entity differences and bonus conditions
Publicly traded (NASDAQ: IBKR), commission-based pricing instead of spread markup. Affiliate program leans institutional — likely needs direct outreach rather than a self-serve signup.
Interactive Brokers scores higher overall (4.1 vs 1.0), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
AMarkets is the stronger fit for copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research, while Interactive Brokers is built more around serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions.
Regulation: AMarkets — Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. Interactive Brokers — SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.
Minimum deposit: AMarkets — Check account type before funding. Interactive Brokers — No minimum.
Pick AMarkets if you're mainly after copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research. It stands out for copy trading materials and metaTrader support.
Pick Interactive Brokers if you're mainly after serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions. It stands out for publicly traded broker and very low commissions.
Interactive Brokers scores higher in our rating (4.1 vs 1.0), but AMarkets may still be the better fit if you specifically need copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research.
AMarkets: Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. Interactive Brokers: SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.