FP Markets
Best raw-pricing candidatePartner link pending; good next review candidate
A side-by-side look at FP Markets and Interactive Brokers — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Partner link pending; good next review candidate
Publicly traded (NASDAQ: IBKR), commission-based pricing instead of spread markup. Affiliate program leans institutional — likely needs direct outreach rather than a self-serve signup.
FP Markets scores higher overall (4.6 vs 4.1), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
FP Markets is the stronger fit for eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders, while Interactive Brokers is built more around serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions.
Regulation: FP Markets — ASIC (286354), CySEC (371/18), FSCA (50926) - operating since 2005, 60+ industry awards. Interactive Brokers — SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.
Minimum deposit: FP Markets — Often from $100, depending on account/entity. Interactive Brokers — No minimum.
Pick FP Markets if you're mainly after eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders. It stands out for strong partner program and raw pricing angle.
Pick Interactive Brokers if you're mainly after serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions. It stands out for publicly traded broker and very low commissions.
FP Markets scores higher in our rating (4.6 vs 4.1), but Interactive Brokers may still be the better fit if you specifically need serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions.
FP Markets: ASIC (286354), CySEC (371/18), FSCA (50926) - operating since 2005, 60+ industry awards. Interactive Brokers: SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.