AMarkets
Best partner-program fitEntity differences and bonus conditions
A side-by-side look at AMarkets and Pepperstone — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Entity differences and bonus conditions
Need partner approval and tracking links before monetized CTA
Pepperstone scores higher overall (4.8 vs 4.2), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
AMarkets is the stronger fit for copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research, while Pepperstone is built more around active traders, cTrader users, TradingView workflows.
Regulation: AMarkets — Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. Pepperstone — Licensed in multiple major jurisdictions.
Minimum deposit: AMarkets — Check account type before funding. Pepperstone — No fixed minimum in many regions.
Pick AMarkets if you're mainly after copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research. It stands out for copy trading materials and metaTrader support.
Pick Pepperstone if you're mainly after active traders, cTrader users, TradingView workflows. It stands out for strong regulation profile and excellent platform stack.
Pepperstone scores higher in our rating (4.8 vs 4.2), but AMarkets may still be the better fit if you specifically need copy trading, MetaTrader users, broker comparison research.
AMarkets: Multiple entities; verify your registration entity. Pepperstone: Licensed in multiple major jurisdictions.