Exness
Best affiliate-scale candidateAdd only after partner account and regional rules are clear
A side-by-side look at Exness and Interactive Brokers — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Add only after partner account and regional rules are clear
Publicly traded (NASDAQ: IBKR), commission-based pricing instead of spread markup. Affiliate program leans institutional — likely needs direct outreach rather than a self-serve signup.
Interactive Brokers scores higher overall (4.1 vs 3.9), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
Exness is the stronger fit for high-volume affiliate traffic, simple onboarding, global reach, while Interactive Brokers is built more around serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions.
Regulation: Exness — Multiple entities including Seychelles/FSCA and other jurisdictions. Interactive Brokers — SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.
Minimum deposit: Exness — Low minimums on several account types. Interactive Brokers — No minimum.
Pick Exness if you're mainly after high-volume affiliate traffic, simple onboarding, global reach. It stands out for large global broker and strong affiliate program.
Pick Interactive Brokers if you're mainly after serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions. It stands out for publicly traded broker and very low commissions.
Interactive Brokers scores higher in our rating (4.1 vs 3.9), but Exness may still be the better fit if you specifically need high-volume affiliate traffic, simple onboarding, global reach.
Exness: Multiple entities including Seychelles/FSCA and other jurisdictions. Interactive Brokers: SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.