Head-to-head comparison

Forex.com vs FP Markets

A side-by-side look at Forex.com and FP Markets — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.

Forex.com

Established US-regulated brand

★ ★ ★ ★★ ★ 3.6

Part of StoneX Group, one of the largest US forex brokers with deep liquidity on majors.

Visit Forex.com

FP Markets

Best raw-pricing candidate

★ ★ ★ ★ ★★4.6

Partner link pending; good next review candidate

Visit FP Markets

Quick verdict

FP Markets scores higher overall (4.6 vs 3.6), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.

Forex.com is the stronger fit for uS-based traders wanting a regulated, established brand, while FP Markets is built more around eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders.

Regulation: Forex.com — CFTC/NFA (US), FCA (UK). FP Markets — ASIC (286354), CySEC (371/18), FSCA (50926) - operating since 2005, 60+ industry awards.

Minimum deposit: Forex.com — $100. FP Markets — Often from $100, depending on account/entity.

Side by side

Forex.comFP Markets

Best forUS-based traders wanting a regulated, established brandECN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders

PlatformsMT4, MT5, TradingViewMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, Iress in some regions

RegulationCFTC/NFA (US), FCA (UK)ASIC (286354), CySEC (371/18), FSCA (50926) - operating since 2005, 60+ industry awards

Minimum deposit$100Often from $100, depending on account/entity

Forex.com strengths

Backed by StoneX Group
Deep liquidity on majors
US CFTC/NFA regulated

FP Markets strengths

Strong partner program
Raw pricing angle
Broad CFD range

Which one should you pick?

Pick Forex.com if you're mainly after uS-based traders wanting a regulated, established brand. It stands out for backed by StoneX Group and deep liquidity on majors.

Pick FP Markets if you're mainly after eCN-style trading, MT4/MT5 users, cost-focused traders. It stands out for strong partner program and raw pricing angle.

Common questions