Forex.com
Established US-regulated brandPart of StoneX Group, one of the largest US forex brokers with deep liquidity on majors.
A side-by-side look at Forex.com and Interactive Brokers — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Part of StoneX Group, one of the largest US forex brokers with deep liquidity on majors.
Publicly traded (NASDAQ: IBKR), commission-based pricing instead of spread markup. Affiliate program leans institutional — likely needs direct outreach rather than a self-serve signup.
Interactive Brokers scores higher overall (4.1 vs 3.6), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
Forex.com is the stronger fit for uS-based traders wanting a regulated, established brand, while Interactive Brokers is built more around serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions.
Regulation: Forex.com — CFTC/NFA (US), FCA (UK). Interactive Brokers — SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.
Minimum deposit: Forex.com — $100. Interactive Brokers — No minimum.
Pick Forex.com if you're mainly after uS-based traders wanting a regulated, established brand. It stands out for backed by StoneX Group and deep liquidity on majors.
Pick Interactive Brokers if you're mainly after serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions. It stands out for publicly traded broker and very low commissions.
Interactive Brokers scores higher in our rating (4.1 vs 3.6), but Forex.com may still be the better fit if you specifically need uS-based traders wanting a regulated, established brand.
Forex.com: CFTC/NFA (US), FCA (UK). Interactive Brokers: SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.