FXOpen
ECN legacy brokerNeeds fresh English review before stronger recommendation
A side-by-side look at FXOpen and Interactive Brokers — score, fees, platforms and who each one actually fits best.
Needs fresh English review before stronger recommendation
Publicly traded (NASDAQ: IBKR), commission-based pricing instead of spread markup. Affiliate program leans institutional — likely needs direct outreach rather than a self-serve signup.
Interactive Brokers scores higher overall (4.1 vs 3.8), but a higher score doesn't automatically mean it's the right pick for you.
FXOpen is the stronger fit for eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows, while Interactive Brokers is built more around serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions.
Regulation: FXOpen — FCA, CySEC (194/13) - operating since 2005; ASIC licence discontinued 2024. Interactive Brokers — SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.
Minimum deposit: FXOpen — Depends on account type. Interactive Brokers — No minimum.
Pick FXOpen if you're mainly after eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows. It stands out for long-running brand and eCN positioning.
Pick Interactive Brokers if you're mainly after serious traders wanting global market access and low commissions. It stands out for publicly traded broker and very low commissions.
Interactive Brokers scores higher in our rating (4.1 vs 3.8), but FXOpen may still be the better fit if you specifically need eCN-style forex trading and older MetaTrader workflows.
FXOpen: FCA, CySEC (194/13) - operating since 2005; ASIC licence discontinued 2024. Interactive Brokers: SEC/FINRA (US), FCA (UK) and more.