Saruja Is Back on CopyFX: Two Accounts, and What the Percentages Hide

Two accounts trading under the Saruja name are drawing subscribers again on RoboForex's CopyFX platform, three weeks after the original SARUJA AI account lost its entire historical gain. We have added both to our rating rather than leave people to find them without context — but the numbers behind the percentages are much smaller than the percentages suggest, and one of them has already had a collapse of its own.

All figures below were pulled from RoboForex's own live data on 23 August 2026 and are a snapshot of that day.

What the first one did, for anyone who missed it

The original account is worth restating because it is the reference point for everything else here.

Its balance fell from roughly $700,000 to $2,234. Maximum drawdown went from about −63% to −99.21%. It had 3,211 subscribers at the end.

Anyone who withdrew near the July peak did extremely well. Anyone still copying on 11 August was left with nothing, and the account was still open with a working "Copy now" button while that was true. Both of those things are the same story, not two different ones.

SARUJAAI: the same operator, already down once

The new MT5 account is confirmed as the same operator, not a lookalike. Its strategy field reads SARUJA, and its description points to the same Telegram channel and the same partner agent ID the previous account used.

It reads +28.38% all time. That percentage is earned on a $102 balance and represents $2.79 of actual profit. The account was opened on 2 July — which is roughly two weeks before the old account peaked and five weeks before it died. The new one was already running while the old one was still taking subscribers.

It has also already had one sharp reversal:

That is 84% of the accumulated gain given back in 48 hours, in the account's third week. It has since recovered to +28.38%. Maximum drawdown so far is −17.01%, there are 25 copiers, the performance fee is 10%, and the strategy note asks you to open a cent account with 1:2000 leverage and switch to swap-free before copying. Gold is 81.58% of its volume.

sarujanext: same name, unproven connection

The second account, SarujaNext, trades on MT4 under the strategy name "Stable Return" and has been running since March.

It reads +72.11% all time — which is $72.44 of profit on a $182 balance. It has 57 copiers and charges a 20% performance fee.

We are not calling it the same trader, because the evidence is not there. It uses a different partner agent ID, a different platform, a different strategy name, and its description shares nothing with the SARUJAAI account beyond the word Saruja. It may be the same person running a second book. It may be someone else using a name that now carries recognition. Treat the name as branding, not as provenance.

What the account's own numbers do say is more useful: 842 trades against a maximum drawdown of 9.09%. A curve that smooth, produced by that many trades, is the signature of an averaging or grid system — the family of strategies that adds to losing positions and posts a beautiful equity line right up until the day it does not. Our explainer on martingale in copy trading covers why that shape is not evidence of low risk, and is closer to the opposite.

This is not unusual on CopyFX, and that is the point

We pulled the full RoboForex rating — 353 accounts — while checking these two. Among the accounts posting the largest all-time percentages, maximum drawdowns of −48%, −58%, −68%, −71%, −93% and −95% are ordinary rather than exceptional.

One example is live right now. XtradeInvestment, an account with 93 subscribers and a 50% performance fee, stood at +118.97% on 12 August. By 21 August it read +74.85%. A third of everything it had accumulated, gone in nine days, while people were copying it.

What changed in our rating

Both accounts are now in our CopyFX rating, scored on what they have proven rather than on what they display.

• SARUJAAI — risk 5, return 5, overall 2.4. Seven weeks old, $2.79 of realised profit, one 84% give-back already behind it.
• SarujaNext — risk 5, return 4, overall 3.0. Five months, $72.44 of realised profit, a curve whose smoothness is the concern rather than the reassurance.

Both sit at the bottom of the list. A high return score and a high risk score are not a recommendation; they describe an account that can move a long way in either direction on very little history.

We also refreshed Onesaday, which some readers have asked about after a bad week. It fell from +2,866% to +1,965% in a single day this month and has recovered most of that, but it now sits 23% below its own peak of +3,592% and its maximum drawdown is −71.14%. It stays in the rating as a high-risk entry. It is, notably, the only account discussed on this page with real money behind it: a $160,478 balance against $151,653 of profit.

How to read a percentage on this platform

Three checks, and all three are on the account's own page:

1. Look at the balance, not the percentage. +28% on $102 and +28% on $100,000 are the same number describing completely different things. A small balance means the trader is risking almost nothing of their own while your money follows their position sizing.
2. Look at the maximum drawdown against the age. A −9% maximum drawdown over five months is not proof of safety; it can equally mean the strategy has not yet met the market condition it cannot survive.
3. Look at what happens after a peak. Every account here has a chart. The question is not how high the line goes, but what it does on the way back down — and whether the account was still accepting copiers while it happened.

Position sizing is the part of this you control, and it matters more here than the choice of account.

Bottom line

The Saruja name is back on CopyFX in two places. One is verifiably the same operator, running a seven-week-old account with $2.79 of profit on it that has already given back 84% of a gain once. The other carries the name but not any evidence of the same hands, and its unusually smooth curve is the thing to be suspicious about rather than reassured by.

Both are in our rating because people are searching for them and deserve the numbers rather than the marketing. Neither is a recommendation. If you copy either one, size the position as though it can go to zero, because on this platform that is a thing that demonstrably happens — it happened to 3,211 people three weeks ago.